The Nazareth Inscription: Rumor and Reaction to the Resurrection of Jesus

A stone inscription acquired on the antiquities market of Nazareth in 1878 appearing to be a rescript of an imperial Roman edict was dubbed “The Nazareth Inscription.” It was taken to France and eventually moved into the Bibliotheque Nationale de France, but remained unpublished until 1930. The inscription was written in ancient Koine Greek, and its main purpose is to give notice that the punishment for stealing a corpse from a stone sealed tomb will be death to the perpetrator(s). Although it was sent from Nazareth, the inscription may have been discovered elsewhere in the area, and Jerusalem or Caesarea Maritima, being the centers of government and culture in the province, are the most likely candidates. Based on epigraphy, the inscription dates to sometime between the 1st century BC and the 1st century AD. Spelling, grammar, and word usage, however, narrow the date considerably. Multiple studies have been done on the inscription over the past 90 years, with scholars generally dating the inscription to the late in the reign of Augustus, Tiberius, Claudius, Caligula, or Nero–a period spanning approximately the first 68 years of the 1st century AD (Cumont, Abel and Lagrange, Gryzbek and Sordi, Cerfaux, Schonbauer, Wegner, Loesch, de Sanctis, Zulueta, Green, Guarducci, Billington). One scholar proposed the reign of Hadrian (Brown), while two others proposed the early period of Augustus, after Actium (Giovannini and Hirt). The period of the reigns of Tiberius and Claudius are the most agreed upon by scholars for the composition of the edict, though if the edict was issued in the Galilee region, it may push the date to the beginning of the reign of Claudius because of the change in political hierarchy at the beginning of his reign (de Sanctis, Kennard). Thus, the composition date was probably between 14 and 54 AD, but more likely about 41 or later when Claudius took power.

The content of the inscription, however, is by far its most interesting aspect. The edict focuses in on anyone who has taken away a corpse from a tomb for “wicked intent,” specifically a type of tomb that is sealed with a stone. A new type of punishment for this crime is then commanded–the death penalty (formerly it was a civil case often settled by paying a fine). Although many details of the inscription could be analyzed, there are three which are most important: 1) the stealing of a corpse from a tomb, 2) a stone sealed tomb, and 3) the extreme reaction to the crime. The Gospel of Matthew records what the official story about the missing body of Jesus was supposed to be: “Some of the guard came into the city and reported to the chief priests all that had happened. And when they had assembled with the elders and consulted together, they gave a large sum of money to the soldiers and said, “You are to say, ‘his [Jesus’] disciples came by night and stole him away while we were asleep.’ And if this should come to the governor’s ears, we will win him over and make you free from care.” And they took the money and did as they had been instructed, and this story was widely spread among the Jews, to this day” (Matthew 28:11-15). The story about the missing body of Jesus was supposed to be that the disciples successfully carried out a plot to steal the body of Jesus from the tomb in order to make it look like He had resurrected and walked out Himself. This correlates with the concern of the edict over people stealing a corpse from a tomb with “wicked intent,” rather than looting the tomb for valuable items to sell, which was the normal practice of tomb robbers. The second detail is the type of tomb mentioned–a stone sealed tomb. Sepulcher sealing stones were used for burials in kokh or arcosolium tombs in Iudaea Province only until 70 AD, and more significantly the stone sealed arcosolium tomb is the type of tomb that Jesus of Nazareth was buried in. The Gospel of Matthew details this type of tomb. “[Joseph of Arimathea] took the body and wrapped it in a clean linen cloth, and laid it in his own new tomb, which he had hewn out in the rock, and he rolled a large stone against the entrance of the tomb” (Matthew 27:59-60). Thus, the type of tomb specifically referred to in the edict is the same type of tomb that Jesus was buried in. The third notable detail is the extreme reaction to the crime of stealing a corpse from a tomb. Normally, this would not even happen–tomb robbers were after valuable grave goods that were buried with people, such as jewelry, coins, furniture, glassware, etc. However, if a body was stolen, the punishment was small, such as a fine paid to the offended family. Yet, the edict commands a new punishment–the most harsh punishment possible for any crime. This new prescription of the death penalty indicates that whatever had happened in the region of Iudaea Province in association with the stealing of a corpse had caused a significant enough problem that the Roman government intervened and enacted a new law which would attempt to prevent any repeat of this type of event.

The composite of the evidence–an edict issued in Iudaea Province (perhaps in Jerusalem or Caesarea Maritima) soon after the resurrection of Jesus of Nazareth in 33 AD, a desperate attempt to stop the stealing corpses from stone sealed tombs for “wicked intent,” a new and extreme prescription of the death penalty, and the spreading of a manufactured story that the disciples had stolen the body of Jesus from the tomb–suggests that the Nazareth Inscription was issued by the Roman government in reaction to the rapidly spreading story of the resurrection of Jesus in the hopes that the disciples and the message could be thwarted, and no future incidents of this nature would happen. Worship of the emperor and total obedience to Rome were in the best interest of the Roman government, and belief in Jesus of Nazareth as the Son of God and Messiah were seen as a threat. This Roman edict, along with the testimonies of numerous historians about Jesus, such as the comments by Josephus that Jesus had been reported as resurrected and was said to be the Messiah, corroborate the resurrection accounts in the Gospels.